Integrating Multi-Tool DevOps Pipelines: Challenges and Solutions

Authors

  • Utham Kumar Anugula Sethupathy Independent Researcher, Atlanta, USA Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2022.0506003

Keywords:

DevOps pipelines, Multi-tool integration, Pipeline orchestration, Tool interoperability, Continuous delivery, Software automation, Policy-as-code, Infrastructure-as-code, Deployment frequency, Change failure rate (CFR)

Abstract

Organizations across industries are accelerating the adoption of DevOps to improve software delivery speed, quality, and reliability. However, large enterprises typically rely on a diverse ecosystem of tools—such as Jira for issue tracking, Jenkins for continuous integration, SonarQube for code quality, Selenium for automated testing, and Kubernetes for container orchestration. Integrating these heterogeneous tools into seamless delivery pipelines poses significant challenges. The lack of standardized interfaces, overlapping functionalities, and inconsistent data flows often hinder efficiency and increase operational complexity.

 This article investigates the orchestration of multi-tool DevOps pipelines, focusing on the challenges of tool interoperability, automation of handoffs, and simplification of complex delivery workflows. Drawing from case studies across industries—including telecommunications, banking, and e-commerce—we present composite practices that demonstrate how organizations integrate disparate toolchains to achieve continuous delivery at scale. Data-driven insights highlight improvements in deployment frequency, reduction in lead time, and decreases in defect leakage when orchestration strategies are effectively implemented.

 The contribution of this study is twofold: first, it outlines practical patterns for multi-tool DevOps integration; second, it provides empirical evidence of the benefits and trade-offs observed in enterprise contexts. The findings serve as actionable guidance for practitioners seeking to optimize DevOps delivery pipelines in environments characterized by tool diversity and organizational complexity.

References

[1] Humble, J.; Farley, D. Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2010.

[2] Forsgren, N.; Humble, J.; Kim, G. 2019 Accelerate State of DevOps Report; DORA: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019.

[3] Bass, L.; Weber, I.; Zhu, L. DevOps: A Software Architect’s Perspective; Addison-Wesley: Boston, MA, USA, 2015.

[4] Fitzgerald, B.; Stol, K.-J. Continuous Software Engineering: A Roadmap and Agenda. J. Syst. Softw. 2017, 123, 176–189.

[5] Debois, P. DevOps: A Software Revolution in the Making. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2016, 18, 78–85.

[6] Shahin, M.; Ali Babar, M.; Zhu, L. Continuous Integration, Delivery and Deployment: A Systematic Review on Approaches, Tools, Challenges and Practices. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 3909–3943.

[7] Kim, G.; Behr, K.; Spafford, G. The Phoenix Project: A Novel about IT, DevOps, and Helping Your Business Win; IT Revolution Press: Portland, OR, USA, 2013.

[8] Ebert, C.; Gallardo, G.; Hernantes, J.; Serrano, N. DevOps. IEEE Softw. 2016, 33, 94–100.

[9] Lenarduzzi, V.; Lomio, F.; Hänninen, T.; Taibi, D. A Threat Analysis Methodology for Continuous Deployment. J. Syst. Softw. 2019, 155, 110–125.

[10] Leite, L.; Rocha, C.; Kon, F.; Milojicic, D.; Meirelles, P. A Survey of DevOps Concepts and Challenges. ACM Comput. Surv. 2019, 52, 1–35.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-01

How to Cite

Integrating Multi-Tool DevOps Pipelines: Challenges and Solutions. (2022). International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology(IJARCST), 5(6), 7319-7329. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2022.0506003