From Fragmentation to Agility: Nautilus Architecture for Risk Management Modernization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2024.0704012Keywords:
Nautilus Centralized Middleware, Machine Learning (ML), Revenue Growth, Staging RolloutsAbstract
The implementation of Nautilus Centralized Application Development Framework for Non-Functional Features will centralize all non-functional features so that Product Teams can concentrate on functional logic and reduce latency in adapting changes to the system and adding new features. It also enables the rapid modification to and addition of Non-Functional Features from one place, thereby speeding up compliance to regulations for National Bank of Umm Al Qaiwain in the UAE, thus reducing time-to-market, empowering product teams to meet demand without needing to deploy additional code and providing an opportunity for revenue growth. Due to testing limitations, the Technical Team of Nautilus has been developing a solid architecture and has ensured smooth operation through User Training and Staging Rollouts. In preparation for cloud native products and AI and Machine Learning (ML) capabilities as well as cross border compliance, Nautilus is building a scalable middle tier Middleware Infrastructure to support future delivery of these product capabilities.
References
1. “Building the Case for Project Risk Management: Advantages and Challenges”, Kate Eby, June 8, 2022, https://www.smartsheet.com/content/project-risk-management-benefits.
2. “Financial institutions and nonfinancial risk: How corporates build resilience”, Björn Nilsson, Thomas Poppensieker, Sebastian Schneider, Michael Thun, February 28, 2022, https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/financial-institutions-and-nonfinancial-risk-how-corporates-build-resilience.
3. “Risk Management in Banking: Types & Best Practices for Mitigation”, January 10, 2024, https://www.unit21.ai/blog/risk-management-in-banking.
4. “The value in digitally transforming credit risk management”, July 2016, https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Risk/Our%20Insights/The%20value%20in%20digitally%20transforming%20credit%20risk%20management/The-value-in-digitally-transforming-credit-risk-management.pdf.
5. “Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Fraud and Scams”, December 2023, https://www.pwc.co.uk/forensic-services/assets/impact-of-ai-on-fraud-and-scams.pdf.
6. “Generative AI is expected to magnify the risk of deepfakes and other fraud in banking”, Satish Lalchand, Val Srinivas, Brendan Maggiore, Joshua Henderson, 2017, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/financial-services/deepfake-banking-fraud-risk-on-the-rise.html.
7. “What banking directors should ask about AI and machine learning risks”, Vidhya Sekhar, Bill Hobbs, 19 Oct 2023, https://www.ey.com/en_us/board-matters/banking-risks-from-ai-and-machine-learning.
8. “AI Why AI is both a risk and a way to manage risk”, Jeanne Boillet, 01 Apr 2018, https://www.ey.com/en_gl/insights/assurance/why-ai-is-both-a-risk-and-a-way-to-manage-risk.
9. “Modern Risk Management for AI Models”, Rajosik Banerjee, Matthias Peter, 2022, https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2022/07/modern-risk-management-for-ai-models.pdf.
10. “AI-Powered Banking in Revolutionizing Fraud Detection: Enhancing Machine Learning to Secure Financial Transactions”, Prem Kumar Sholapurapu, 2023, https://doi.org/10.70135/seejph.vi.6162.
11. “What banking directors should ask about AI and machine learning risks”, Vidhya Sekhar, Bill Hobbs, 19 Oct 2023, https://www.ey.com/en_us/board-matters/banking-risks-from-ai-and-machine-learning.
12. “What are SLOs? How service-level objectives work with SLIs to deliver on SLAs”, Saif Gunja, November 18, 2022, https://www.dynatrace.com/news/blog/what-are-slos/.
