Enterprise Project Portfolios in Banking: A Governance Framework for Risk-Resilient Transformation in Highly Regulated Environments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2022.0501002Keywords:
Enterprise Project Portfolio Governance, Banking Transformation, Regulatory Compliance Management, AI-Driven Risk Intelligence, Financial Services Modernization, Multi-Layer Governance Framework, Predictive Analytics in Portfolio ManagementAbstract
Banks operate within one of the most heavily regulated, risk-sensitive, and operationally complex ecosystems in the global economy. Large financial institutions typically manage vast enterprise project portfolios consisting of hundreds - sometimes thousands - of concurrent initiatives that span mandatory regulatory compliance (Basel III, CCAR, AML/KYC, PSD2, SOX), digital modernization programs, cybersecurity hardening, multi-cloud adoption, payments rail transformation, and multi-year core banking replacement programs. These portfolios are deeply interdependent, such that delays or deviations in a single regulatory or technology initiative can propagate across business lines, introduce systemic risk, and trigger supervisory scrutiny. As a result, effective portfolio-level governance is not merely a management discipline - it is a strategic necessity for ensuring delivery predictability, operational continuity, and regulatory assurance.
This research introduces a comprehensive and integrated governance framework specifically designed for enterprise-scale banking portfolios. The framework synthesizes Enterprise Project Portfolio Management (EPPM) practices with AI-driven risk analytics, predictive compliance signals, and real-time regulatory intelligence to create a resilient transformation strategy that can withstand the volatility, audit pressure, and complex dependency structures inherent in financial institutions. By applying machine learning–enabled risk forecasting, dynamic prioritization models, and multi-layer governance controls, the approach enables banks to detect emerging risks earlier, optimize resource allocation, and enforce consistent regulatory adherence across lines of business and geographies.
The study draws on multi-year empirical evidence from major retail, commercial, and capital-markets financial institutions, analyzing transformation portfolios valued between USD 800 million and USD 4.2 billion. Quantitative analyses demonstrate strong correlations between governance maturity and improved transformation outcomes. Institutions operating at higher governance maturity levels exhibit substantial reductions in regulatory deviations, delivery failures, excessive change-request volume, redundant spend, and budget leakage. The research also incorporates four advanced diagrams illustrating end-to-end portfolio flow dynamics, risk accumulation and escalation pathways, governance council structures, and enterprise-level integrated governance operating models.
Results indicate that organizations adopting the proposed integrated governance framework achieve up to a 42% reduction in transformation volatility, a 53% decrease in project overruns, and a 67% improvement in regulatory alignment, while enhancing transparency, auditability, and executive decision velocity. These findings confirm that a unified governance framework - reinforced by AI-enabled risk intelligence - creates a high-assurance delivery ecosystem capable of navigating the increasing complexity of global financial transformation while protecting institutional resilience, customer trust, and regulatory standing.
References
1. Knapp, M. (2021). Enterprise Portfolio Governance: How Organisations Optimise Value from Their Project Portfolios. Springer.
2. Project Management Institute. (n.d.). Enterprise Project Portfolio Management (EPPM) Based on Oracle's Framework. PMI Learning Library.
3. Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). “A conceptual framework for project governance.” International Journal of Project Management.
4. Mohosho, J. S. (2024). “The effect of governance and governmentality on project portfolio success.” Acta Commercii.
5. Sutienė, K. (2024). “Enhancing portfolio management using artificial intelligence.” PMC/NCBI.
6. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2021). “Opportunities and Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Finance.” IMF Working Paper.
7. Financial Stability Board (FSB). (2024). The Financial Stability Implications of Artificial Intelligence. FSB Report.
8. Vuković, D. B., et al. (2025). “AI integration in financial services: A systematic review.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
9. Torkian, V. (2025). “A risk-return multi-objective optimization approach for financial transformation portfolios.” Portfolio-Project Management Journal.
10. Kovacevic, A., Radenkovic, S. D., & Nikolic, D. (2024). “Artificial intelligence and cybersecurity in banking sector: Opportunities and risks.”


