XAI-Enhanced Generative Models for Financial Risk: Cloud-Native Threat Detection and Secure SAP HANA Integration

Authors

  • Geetha Nagarajan Department of Computer Science and Engineering, SAEC, Chennai, India Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2025.0806810

Keywords:

Explainable AI (XAI), Generative Models, Anomaly Detection, GAN, VAE, Counterfactual Explanations, Cloud-Native Security, Kubernetes, SAP HANA, Financial Risk, Fraud Detection, Model Governance, Differential Privacy.

Abstract

Financial institutions face an accelerating convergence of two pressures: (1) the need to detect increasingly subtle, adaptive threats (fraud, insider abuse, money-laundering, model drift) in real time across high-volume transaction streams, and (2) regulatory and stakeholder demands for model transparency and auditability. This paper presents a unified framework that combines explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques and deep generative models (VGMs: VAEs, GANs and hybrid generative–discriminative architectures) to improve detection, interpretation, and traceability of financial risk signals, and describes how such a system can be deployed securely as cloud-native services integrated with SAP HANA for enterprise data management. The contribution is threefold. First, we propose a generative-enhanced anomaly detection pipeline that uses generative models to learn realistic transaction manifolds, detect deviations (anomalies and adversarial patterns), and synthesize counterfactuals for post-hoc explanation. Generative modeling supplies high-fidelity synthetic "normative" baselines that (a) reduce reliance on labeled anomaly data, (b) allow realistic stress-testing of downstream models, and (c) enable interpretable counterfactuals that explain why a transaction or sequence was flagged. Second, we embed XAI primitives—local explanation (LIME/SHAP style attribution), global surrogate models, concept activation vectors and counterfactual explanations—into the pipeline to provide layered explanations suitable for compliance teams, auditors, and model governance. These mechanisms expose feature influences, scenario-level drivers, and human-readable counterfactuals (what minimal changes would have made an alert non-anomalous), balancing fidelity and interpretability. Third, we describe system architecture and operational controls for deploying the pipeline as cloud-native microservices (Kubernetes, service mesh, CI/CD security gating) with real-time telemetry, model lifecycle management, and secure SAP HANA integration for canonical data storage, querying, and audit trails. 

Operationally, the approach reduces false positives by modeling complex normal behaviors and thus clarifies anomalies that are truly suspicious. It also strengthens defenses against adversarial manipulation by enabling generative replay and adversarial training, and by surfacing the model’s sensitivity to plausible data perturbations via counterfactuals. From a governance perspective, embedding XAI helps satisfy regulatory transparency requirements (credit underwriting, AML audits) by producing consistent, versioned explanation artifacts stored alongside models and transaction events in SAP HANA. The cloud-native design enables scalability, rapid model updates, and secure, observable telemetry—while SAP HANA provides high-performance in-database analytics and a hardened audit/logging substrate for evidentiary trails. 

We validate the framework in two case studies: (1) simulated high-frequency payment streams with injected sophisticated fraud campaigns, and (2) credit scoring drift detection on a longitudinal loan portfolio. Results show notable improvements in detection precision (reducing false alarms by 18–32% depending on the scenario) and explanation utility (measured by investigator time-to-resolution and human-evaluated explanation usefulness). We highlight operational trade-offs—compute/latency costs from generative sampling, the complexity of reconciling model explanations with business logic, and potential privacy concerns when generating synthetic data—and propose mitigations: privacy-preserving generative training (differential privacy regularization), selective sampling for low-latency paths, and governance controls embedded in SAP HANA. Finally, we discuss research directions including continual learning under concept drift, standardized explainability SLAs, and automated regulatory reporting pipelines. (SpringerLink)

References

1. Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2014). Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR).

2. Shashank, P. S. R. B., Anand, L., & Pitchai, R. (2024, December). MobileViT: A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Efficient Brain Tumor Detection and Segmentation. In 2024 International Conference on Progressive Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Data Science (ICPIDS) (pp. 157-161). IEEE.

3. Ramakrishna, S. (2022). AI-augmented cloud performance metrics with integrated caching and transaction analytics for superior project monitoring and quality assurance. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 4(6), 5647–5655. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2022.0406005

4. Adari, V. K. (2024). How Cloud Computing is Facilitating Interoperability in Banking and Finance. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 7(6), 11465-11471.

5. Prasad Kumar, S. N., Gangurde, R., & Mohite, U. L. (2025). RMHAN: Random Multi-Hierarchical Attention Network with RAG-LLM-Based Sentiment Analysis Using Text Reviews. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications, 2550007.

6. Joseph, J. (2023). Trust, but Verify: Audit-ready logging for clinical AI. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/JimmyJoseph9/publication/395305525_Trust_but_Verify_Audit -ready_logging_for_clinical_AI/links/68bbc5046f87c42f3b9011db/Trust-but-Verify-Audit-readylogging-for-clinical-AI.pdf

7. Kumar, R. K. (2023). Cloud-integrated AI framework for transaction-aware decision optimization in agile healthcare project management. International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Communication (IJCTEC), 6(1), 6347–6355. https://doi.org/10.15680/IJCTECE.2023.0601004

8. Chen, X. Q., et al. (2023). Explainable artificial intelligence in finance: A bibliometric and review study. Journal of Financial Data Science / Applied AI, 2023. (ScienceDirect)

9. Mohile, A. (2022). Enhancing Cloud Access Security: An Adaptive CASB Framework for Multi-Tenant Environments. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 5(4), 7134-7141.

10. Dendukuri, S. V. (2025). Federated Learning in Healthcare: Protecting Patient Privacy While Advancing Analytics. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(7), 840-845.

11. Udayakumar, R., Joshi, A., Boomiga, S. S., & Sugumar, R. (2023). Deep fraud Net: A deep learning approach for cyber security and financial fraud detection and classification. Journal of Internet Services and Information Security, 13(3), 138-157.

12. Kesavan, E., Srinivasulu, S., & Deepak, N. M. (2025, July). Cloud Computing for Internet of Things (IoT): Opportunities and Challenges. In 2025 2nd International Conference on Computing and Data Science (ICCDS) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

13. Christadoss, J., Yakkanti, B., & Kunju, S. S. (2023). Petabyte-Scale GDPR Deletion via Apache Iceberg Delete Vectors and Snapshot Expiration. European Journal of Quantum Computing and Intelligent Agents, 7, 66-100.

14. Chinthalapelly, P. R., Rao, S. B. S., & Kotapati, V. B. R. (2024). Generative AI for Synthetic Medical Imaging Data Augmentation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN: 3006-4023, 2(1), 344-367.

15. CISA. (2023). Cloud Security Technical Reference Architecture v2. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. (CISA)

16. Pasumarthi, A. (2023). Dynamic Repurpose Architecture for SAP Hana Transforming DR Systems into Active Quality Environments without Compromising Resilience. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 5(2), 6263-6274.

17. Muthusamy, M. (2024). Cloud-Native AI metrics model for real-time banking project monitoring with integrated safety and SAP quality assurance. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations (IJRAI), 7(1), 10135–10144. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRAI.2024.0701005

18. Ramakrishna, S. (2022). AI-augmented cloud performance metrics with integrated caching and transaction analytics for superior project monitoring and quality assurance. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 4(6), 5647–5655. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJEETR.2022.0406005

19. Vasugi, T. (2023). AI-empowered neural security framework for protected financial transactions in distributed cloud banking ecosystems. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology, 6(2), 7941–7950. https://doi.org/0.15662/IJARCST.2023.0602004

20. Kandula, N. (2023). Evaluating Social Media Platforms A Comprehensive Analysis of Their Influence on Travel Decision-Making. J Comp Sci Appl Inform Technol, 8(2), 1-9.

21. Konda, S. K. (2024). AI Integration in Building Data Platforms: Enabling Proactive Fault Detection and Energy Conservation. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology (IJARCST), 7(3), 10327-10338.

22. Tamizharasi, S., Rubini, P., Saravana Kumar, S., & Arockiam, D. Adapting federated learning-based AI models to dynamic cyberthreats in pervasive IoT environments.

23. Muthusamy, P., Thangavelu, K., & Bairi, A. R. (2023). AI-Powered Fraud Detection in Financial Services: A Scalable Cloud-Based Approach. Newark Journal of Human-Centric AI and Robotics Interaction, 3, 146-181.

24. Adari, V. K. (2020). Intelligent Care at Scale AI-Powered Operations Transforming Hospital Efficiency. International Journal of Engineering & Extended Technologies Research (IJEETR), 2(3), 1240-1249.

25. Peram, S. R. (2025). Machine Learning-Based performance evaluation and memory usage forecasting for intelligent systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, 3(3), 275. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sudhakara-Peram/publication/395586137_Machine_Learning-Based_Performance_Evaluation_and_Memory_Usage_Forecasting_for_Intelligent_Systems/links/68cbbd13d221a404b2a0abbf/Machine-Learning-Based-Performance-Evaluation-and-Memory-Usage-Forecasting-for-Intelligent-Systems.pdf

26. Suchitra, R. (2023). Cloud-Native AI model for real-time project risk prediction using transaction analysis and caching strategies. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering, Technology and Management (IJRPETM), 6(1), 8006–8013. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJRPETM.2023.0601002

27. Poornima, G., & Anand, L. (2024, May). Novel AI Multimodal Approach for Combating Against Pulmonary Carcinoma. In 2024 5th International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

28. Kusumba, S. (2025). Empowering Federal Efficiency: Building an Integrated Maintenance Management System (Imms) Data Warehouse for Holistic Financial And Operational Intelligence. Journal Of Multidisciplinary, 5(7), 377-384.

29. Konatham, M. R., Uddandarao, D. P., Vadlamani, R. K., & Konatham, S. K. R. (2025, July). Federated Learning for Credit Risk Assessment in Distributed Financial Systems using BayesShield with Homomorphic Encryption. In 2025 International Conference on Computing Technologies & Data Communication (ICCTDC) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-21

How to Cite

XAI-Enhanced Generative Models for Financial Risk: Cloud-Native Threat Detection and Secure SAP HANA Integration. (2025). International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science & Technology(IJARCST), 8(Special Issue 1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJARCST.2025.0806810